Construction Injuries & the Statutory Employer Doctrine Update

If you suffer an injury on a construction job in Pennsylvania, another person or company at the site may bear responsibility. Construction accidents take many forms: a falling steel girder; dropped tools or materials; a saw accident causing an amputation; defective scaffolding; a fall from an unsecured ladder; an unguarded…

read more

Filing Before PA’s MDJ: Protect the Statute of Limitations? 

For decades, Pennsylvania lawyers have wrestled with a deceptively simple question: Does filing a complaint before a magisterial district judge—Pennsylvania’s small claims court—protect the statute of limitations?     The concern is understandable. Small claims proceedings are designed to be accessible and relatively informal. A complaint may consist of a short…

read more

Pennsylvania Upholds Its $250,000 State Liability Cap on Negligence Claims

A Jury Trial Right Without a Meaningful Opportunity? In a long-awaited decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the Commonwealth’s $250,000 damages cap against a constitutional challenge. The ruling in Freilich v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, No. 10 EAP 2024 (Pa. Oct. 1, 2026) addresses an issue that has frustrated plaintiffs’ attorneys…

read more

Understanding PA’s Increased Risk of Future Harm Doctrine

Clients of ours often inquire:  what if another person’s conduct puts me at risk for harm in the future?  Examples include:      A doctor who carelessly orders numerous x-rays of the patient’s chest, putting her at risk of harm for cancer.  But no cancer occurred, not yet at least.    …

read more

Suing Someone Who Lives in Another Country? The Hague Service Convention

In today’s global economy, it is increasingly common for Americans to do business with individuals and companies located overseas. International travel, online commerce, remote work, and foreign investment have made cross-border disputes far more common than they once were.    If a U.S. court has jurisdiction over the dispute—for example,…

read more

Defendants: Be Careful What You Share With Others!

Understanding Pennsylvania’s Common Interest Privilege Most people know that conversations with their attorney are generally confidential. That protection is called the attorney-client privilege. However, what happens when two different people or companies, each with their own lawyers, need to work together on the same legal problem?  Examples include:  Plaintiff falls…

read more

PA Superior Court Revives WUCP Claim: Carmen Enterprises v. Goldin

The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Carmen Enterprises, Inc. v. Ely Goldin, Esq. and Fox Rothschild, LLP is a important reminder about PA’s Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings Act (“WUCP”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8351–8354 (often called the “Dragonetti Act“).  The Superior Court confirmed that a WUCPA claim can be…

read more

Electronic Signature in PA: Validity, Authentication & Need For a Hearing 

Introduction Electronic signatures now dominate modern commerce, employment relationships, consumer transactions, and litigation. Yet Pennsylvania courts continue to confront a recurring question: when a party denies signing an electronic agreement, what evidence sufficiently authenticates the electronic signature and proves assent?  The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Levin v. Prime…

read more