A Trade Secret in Pennsylvania  

Pittsburgh lawyer sitting at desk for trade secret claim and defenseIf you are facing a "trade secret" claim or threat that may require a legal defense, please contact a Pittsburgh lawyer at our firm. Losing a trade secret case can result in you paying compensatory and punitive damages, plus paying the plaintiff's attorney fees. 

What is a Trade Secret?

Pennsylvania's Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) protects information that (1) has a special character (e.g., customer lists, drawings, recipes), (2) is not generally unknown to the world, (3) required the owner's investment of time and money to develop and (4) the owner has made reasonable efforts to keep it secret.  

Closely Related Areas of Law 

Employers often ask employees to sign a contract that includes both "trade secret" protection for the employer plus other other restrictive covenants. These can include a Non-Disclosure Agreement (or NDA), which can protect information falling short of DTSA protection, a noncompete clause, and/or a non-solicitation agreement, to further protect the employer's business. We have litigated restrictive covenant cases in state and federal court for over twenty-five (25) years.

Contact our Pittsburgh Litigation Lawyers via email or phone for a consultation for any trade secret matter in Pennsylvania.  

412.342.0992

Our Location 

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Phone # and Best Time to Call You

    Your Message

    Please prove you are human by selecting the car.

    ---

    Frequently Asked Questions - FAQs

    Do Employers Mischaracterize Data As "Trade Secrets"?

    Many employers incorrectly designate all information they share with their employees as "trade secrets." In reality, no UTSA protection exists for commonly known information within an industry. Thus, while teaching a salesman how to close a big deal is valuable, it's not necessarily a "trade secret." The same goes for good human resource (HR) strategies, especially if the same or similar strategy can be found from a simple Google search. 

    But there are no guarantees in court and you should take every threatened claim very seriously.  

     

    How Exactly Does PA Define a True "Secret"?

    Pennsylvania's Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) defines "trade secret" as follows: 

    "...Information, including a formula, drawing, pattern, compilation including a customer list, program, device, method, technique or process that:
    (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use.
    (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy."

    Overall, Pennsylvania law defines a "trade secret" as a purely private fact that gives one business an edge over others.  The information has value because the owner used time and/or money to invest to develop it.  However, it does not include all work-product created on the job.  For example, if a worker creates a spreadsheet on the job, trade secret protection does not necessarily extend to the spreadsheet. Rather, the courts will look at the information that populates it.  And, did the employer/owner of the information take reasonable steps to keep the information private? 

     

    What's "Reasonable" Effort to Maintain Secrecy? 

    This is where many trade secret protection claims fall flat.  The owner must make "reasonable" efforts to maintain secrecy of the information. 

    In the Coca Cola example, since 1881, only two of its workers are privy to the complete formula at any given time.  Allegedly, they are not permitted to travel together, and each must designate a successor before passing. (But in reality, after all this time, the simple formula is not likely a "secret" to any competitor.)  

    Moreover, in Pauwels v. Deloitte LLP, No. 22-21-cv, 2nd Cir, Court of Appeals (Oct. 6, 2023), the creator of a spreadsheet formula -- for picking stocks -- found himself out of luck for trade secret protection, after he shared the information with two others, without having first asked them to protect the information.  Thus, the court denied the stock picker any protection or remedy (either equitable or legal) for his trade secret.  However, however, he did have a claim for "unjust enrichment" for another's use of the information for profit.

     

    What are Some Clear-Cut Examples Where UTSA Protection Exists?

    Here is a partial list of examples: 

    Customer Lists

    The DTSA expressly protects customer lists, as something the owner/employer developed from its own efforts.  However, a customer list derived purely from the phone book, trade journals, or other public sources may not garner protection.  See Brubaker Kitchens, Inc. v. Brown. 

    Training Manuals

    The Act specifically lists "programs," such as training seminars provided to employees. But the information must not be publicly available online, for example, as that would give competitors free access to discover it. 

    Recipes

    Coca Cola famously decided against seeking patent protection for its secret formula for Coke™.  Patent protection expires after 20 years, but once patented, absolute secrecy of the idea no longer matters. Instead, Coca Cola decided to treat its formula as a trade secret, a right that never expires, unless Coca Cola fails to take reasonable steps to safeguard the information and keep it secret. 

    What Makes Information and Financial Data Unique? 

    In Oceanic, Inc. v. Shields, a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania decided that the intent to use an infomercial -- and the financial data about a company -- were not true "secrets."  The reasoning?   The court found that the information (an infomercial) lacked economic value.  

    Contrast the above with B & B Microscopes v. Armogida.  There, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania decided developments of a PICS System (for use by forensic labs, allows for the automatic detection and identification of the presence of sperm in a sample placed under a microscope) constituted a trade secret.

     

    What Is Theft or "Misappropriation"?

    The Uniform Trade Secret Act, 12 Pa. C.S. § 5302 ("the Act") defines "misappropriation" as follows:

    (1) acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or (2) disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent...

     

    What Protections and Recoveries Exist in PA?

    What protections and remedies exist for trade secret theft under the Act? These include:

        • A restraining order (or injunction) to stop further sharing of the information, 
        • Money damages for the lost profit or business opportunity,
        • Punitive damages (not to exceed twice the actual damages), in the even of willful or malicious conduct, and, 
        • Attorney fees and costs of prosecution.   

     

    What Other Claims Can Be Brought?

    A worker who has access to the employer's trade secrets might also have the ability to inter with the employer's contracts with customers.  Taking the customer list -- and customers -- to another employer, can also expose the worker for a claim of breach of fiduciary duty or tortious interference with contracts, which allow for an award for punitive damages of up to nine times the amount of compensatory damages.  Bert Co. v. Turk, 298 A.3d 44 (Pa. 2023). On appeal, the PA Supreme court upheld a jury verdict of $2.8M for punitive damages, as not exceeding a ratio of 9:1 when compared to actual damages caused by each Defendant.  

     

    Time period to Bring Suit:
    How Long Does a Trade Secret Last?

    A watch on the wrist, signifying how much time litigation will takeUnlike a patent, a trade secret can last forever. However, Pennsylvania imposes a three (3) year statute of limitations, which starts running the moment the plaintiff knows -- or reasonably should have known through "reasonable diligence" -- his information had been stolen. The Act provides:

    § 5307 Statute of limitations.
    An action . . . must be brought within three years after the [theft] was discovered or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered.

     

    However, if trade secret protection exists via contract, then a party has the four year statute of limitations to sue for breach of contract. In fact, via contract governing use of trade secrets, the parties can limit or extend the deadline to file suit to protect secrets.

     

    Can the Owner of a "Secret" Waive His Rights to It?

    Yes. A defense of waiver exists for any claim stemming from the Uniform Trade Secret Act, 12 Pa. C.S. § 5302 ("the Act").  But what about sharing the confidential information with the government, pursuant to regulatory oversight requirements?  For more, click here.

     

    Do All States Follow the Uniform Trade Secret Act (UTSA)?

    Most do.  While New York and Massachusetts rely on their judge-made law (or "common law"), all other states have adopted some version of the UTSA. 

     

    What Business Sectors Typically See Wars Over "Secrets"?

    It's common for people to use the Act to protect their "industry turf," regardless of whether the information at issue constitutes a secret.  Common sectors of business where this occurs include:

          • The insurance industry, where insurance agents are unhappy and break off to form an entity that competes with their former insurance company employer. Click here for more.
          • The medical profession,
          • Hiring an employee from a fellow tech-sector business. Click here for an example involving Pittsburgh's PPG,  and
          • The sales industry, where exiting employees have access to customer lists that a prospective employer would want.
    Has the Number of Trade Secret Claims Increased? 

    Yes.  Though the Federal Trade Commission's ban on noncompetes has failed, the popularity of noncompete enforcement is at an all-time low. Instead, we are seeing businesses pivot to sue outgoing employees for contrived trade secret violations in lieu of noncompete enforcement. 

     

    What is the History Of This Area of Law in PA?

    File marked "trade secret," regarding litigation of claims by lawyers for misappropriation Before a Pittsburgh lawyer at our firm defines "trade secret," let's briefly look at how the law has evolved in Pennsylvania. First, the Pennsylvania Bar Association (click here) describes the origins as follows:

    In Pennsylvania, protection of information under the trade secret law was clarified by Pennsylvania’s adoption of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act in 2004. Prior to 2004, trade secret protection in Pennsylvania only existed through common law.

    The Act permits the award of damages or injunctive relief in order to protect trade secrets. This protection can be extended to anything that meets the definition of trade secret. Thus, in understanding whether something can be protected under the Act, the primary issue is whether the information meets the definition of trade secret, which requires that information was identified as a trade secret and the information was protected as a trade secret.

     

    Is There a Federal Claim For Violation of Trade Secrets?

    Yes.  In 2016, the United States Congress passed -- and President Obama signed into law -- the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), which is very similar to PA's DTSA, but the federal version creates jurisdiction in federal courts. Click here to learn more.  

     

    Can the Owner of a "Trade Secret" Get Insurance on the
    Value of It, if Stolen or Shared?

    Yes.  Click here for more information about obtaining insurance to compensate the owner of the trade secret for (1) the value of the secret and (2) legal costs to litigate the claim.

     

    Is There Liability Insurance For Thief  Trade Secrets?  
    No, liability insurance generally does not cover theft. This is because liability insurance typically covers negligence, whereas theft is considered intentional conduct. Public policy prohibits insurance coverage for intentional acts, including the theft or misappropriation of confidential information or trade secrets.
    However, it is still advisable for a defendant in a trade secret action to investigate whether any general liability coverage in effect at the time of the alleged theft might apply. The cost of defending such a claim without insurance coverage can be substantial. 

     

    How I Get a Rapid Response to My Trade Secret Question?   

      Each Pittsburgh attorney at our firm --  who focus on civil litigation, generally, and commercial disputes specifically -- can represent you in state and federal court, compulsory arbitration, and in AAA arbitration.  Our Pittsburgh Litigation Lawyers charge a flat fee of only $200 to review the trade secret claim against you.

    A phone, showing how to contact a Pittsburgh Trade Secret Lawyer today

    412.342.0992

      Your Name (required)

      Your Email (required)

      Phone # and Best Time to Call You

      Your Message

      Please prove you are human by selecting the cup.